Six digital engagements and seven manufacturing programs. Every entry carries the customer, what they needed, what we did and the measured result — minimum precision, lead time, process. Customers are described by sector; named references are available on request.
Digital programs
Six engagement types we run repeatedly. Each links to the capability that owns it, where the technical detail lives.
Deeply customized development that fits a vendor's actual business scenarios, on an architecture built for high performance and high availability, iterated continuously from requirements through delivery.
Delivered work includes a factory automation production line toolchain and a 3D product design environment.
Software & data capabilityBuilt on our own digital production platform: 3D visualization of the factory, factory process management and equipment status management — with a seamless connection from design drawings through to equipment code.
Three layers 3D plant model · process routing · live machine status
Industrial systems capabilityXCAD for 2D drafting and 3D modeling with block and symbol libraries and a plugin API; CAE topology optimization; CAM toolpath generation from the same model; and generative design exploring structures that are hard to reach by hand.
Measured in the CAE work a part taken from 5.7 to 3.0 on the optimization example, while staying machinable on 3-axis and 2.5-axis equipment.
Software & data capabilityInteractive builds across a lightweight cross-platform engine for 2D and mobile-web delivery, and Unreal for high-fidelity 3D — chosen against the target device and frame budget rather than by preference.
Delivery targets web and mobile builds from one codebase
Software & data capabilityLow-latency streaming, high-concurrency access, green-screen chroma key, virtual studio and a host operating procedure — with tipping and live commerce running on the same stack as the broadcast.
One stack studio · encoding · delivery · interaction
Software & data capabilityCustomer-facing applications built alongside the hardware and the plant systems they talk to — same team, same backlog, so the integration is nobody else's problem.
Delivery surfaces app · web · mobile
Software & data capabilityManufacturing programs
Expand any program for the requirement, what we did, and the part specification. These are the numbers from the job sheets, not round-ups.
Take weight out of a structural part without losing mechanical performance, and produce it on the equipment the customer already had. Not on a 5-axis machine they would have had to buy to make the optimization worthwhile.
Loads, constraints, material and manufacturing requirements went in as parameters, and AI algorithms explored the resulting design space for topology-optimized and bionic structures that are hard to reach by hand. Each option was validated in CAE against the original mechanical requirement before it went any further.
The optimized structure was then regenerated against actual machine capability, 3-axis and 2.5-axis, with CAM toolpaths generated from the same model, so the geometry that left the optimization loop was the geometry that got cut. Constraining the optimization toward the process also reduced reliance on complex fixturing compared with the original design.
Design, simulation and toolpath came off one model, so the handoff where optimization results usually die, design tool to process engineer, didn't exist on this program.
A software company arrived at our one-stop manufacturing center with an electronic chip and a simple ask: design a complete positioning product around it.
Using additive manufacturing, we delivered a single service running from design through fabrication, post-processing and assembly — enough for the customer to build a positioning wristband around the chip, with mold-based mass production following.
Envelope: no more than 50 × 50 mm. Process: stereolithography. The program then moved to tooling for volume production.
A turbine manufacturer needed exactly one sample. Traditional casting could not produce it at a cost that made sense — the tooling would have cost more than the part was worth.
We collapsed a casting mold workflow that normally runs through multiple stages into a two-step flexible process, and supplied sand molds that connect directly into the customer's existing manufacturing line. The customer gained a custom production capability their traditional process couldn't offer at all.
Material: sand. Process: rapid sand casting.
An electronics production and assembly factory took an urgent small-batch order and needed to expand its line immediately: 700 sets of existing fixtures, fast. The original injection molding supplier didn't respond — the quantity was too small and the deadline too short.
We ran the job on our own flexible production line and skipped the tooling cycle entirely, which is what made the quantity and the deadline compatible.
Envelope: 65 × 65 × 4 mm. Material: PLA. Process: FDM.
An orthopedic medical institution had CT data of a patient's fracture site. The clinical team needed a model built quickly and a physical object in hand for diagnostic reference — not a rendering on a screen.
We worked alongside a CT image processing partner to produce high-precision modeling from the scan data, then printed the bone using rapid prototyping. The imaging expertise and the manufacturing sat in the same workflow instead of being handed between vendors.
An environmental engineering firm had introduced an integrated rural wastewater treatment system built on low-energy MBR membrane bioreactor technology. Its program manager came to us with two goals for one object: verify that the environmental governance plan was sound, and present it convincingly to a wider audience.
We designed and modeled the governance scheme and produced it with FDM fused deposition in PLA — a physical model large enough to read as infrastructure rather than as a tabletop mock-up.
Envelope: 4000 × 2000 × 200 mm. Material: PLA. Process: FDM.
Alex, an independent designer from the Czech Republic, found us through the website with a working mechanical exoskeleton hand and one unresolved problem: the fingers. To keep the hand at human scale while armoring it and fitting moving parts inside, the gap between fingers was too small and the bones too short. Hydraulic or electric, driving one finger consumed a lot of space — and all five still had to move.
Simulation was used to verify the linkage before anything was printed, and to settle which materials and processes could produce the geometry. The hand was then produced by 3D printing.
Envelope: 200 × 200 × 40 mm. Material: PLA. Process: FDM. The finished hand moves freely once worn — useful in daily tasks, and in rehabilitation for hand injuries.
Two or three sentences in the customer's own words, approved in writing before it goes live.
Name · Role · CompanyAbout these write-ups
Every figure on this page, precision, lead time, dimensions, material, process, comes from the program record. We don't round a 0.02 mm job up to "sub-micron", and we do not report a percentage saving we can't reproduce.
Every customer on this page is described by sector instead of by name — that's our default, not an exception. If you need a reference call in your own industry, ask: where a customer has agreed to be named, we will introduce you and tell you exactly what they bought.
Tell us the constraint — a deadline, a tolerance, a single sample casting can't justify. We will tell you which program it resembles, including the parts that were difficult.